Lets Count: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
242 bytes removed ,  3 February 2024
m
no edit summary
(I added more information concerning the new Lets Count thread)
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
After quite a few messages, (I don't remember how many, exactly, but it was a few thousand) the original thread started to get very laggy. If you went to notifications in teams, and the top one was a reply in the counting thread, it would crash teams, if not your whole computer. So, Shelli created a new thread called "Lets Count: CONTINUED"<ref><cite class="note">(I think the "continued" was in all caps? someone fact-check me on this)</ref> After another few thousand messages, however, that thread experienced the same problem with lag. Since Shelli Selby left NSA, [[Hallie Griffin]] took up the mantle and created a thread called "Lets Count: CONTINUED: Continued."
After quite a few messages, (I don't remember how many, exactly, but it was a few thousand) the original thread started to get very laggy. If you went to notifications in teams, and the top one was a reply in the counting thread, it would crash teams, if not your whole computer. So, Shelli created a new thread called "Lets Count: CONTINUED"<ref><cite class="note">(I think the "continued" was in all caps? someone fact-check me on this)</ref> After another few thousand messages, however, that thread experienced the same problem with lag. Since Shelli Selby left NSA, [[Hallie Griffin]] took up the mantle and created a thread called "Lets Count: CONTINUED: Continued."


(I do believe that they began counting backwards at some point around two thousand- I don't know if that is true or if it is when they turned around again and started going forwards, but as of right now it's at 7643 and increasing)<ref><cite class="note">Confirmed by [[Samuel Grady]]: After 2082, [[Keene Elkins]] jumped to 2100. [[Sunda Schwertfeger]] then proceeded to count backwards (probably to correct the jump). Then, after a few hundred backwards-counting messages, the counting continued forwards as normal (is there anything normal at northstar?), with some mild confusion to those who saw this afterward.</ref>
At the beginning of 2024, that thread also began to lag significantly. It lagged so much that the participants started talk of making a new thread. On February 3, 2024, when the old thread was at 9072, [[Jacob Grady]] started a new thread called Lets Count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again.
[[Category:Groups, Chats, and Threads]]
[[Category:Groups, Chats, and Threads]]
<references />At the beginning of 2024, the thread began to lag significantly. It lagged so much that the participants started talk of making a new thread. On February 3, 2024, [[Jacob Grady]] started a new thread, called Lets Count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again.
the participants have together counted from one to nine thousand, one hundred, and twenty-seven.<ref><cite class="note">as of November 20, 2023, at 9:48am CST, reported by Samuel Grady.</cite></ref> The thread that [[Hallie Griffin]] owned (made October 15th) has 50 respondents (over the course of 2621 messages). The thread that Jacob Grady made currently has 58 replies from six individuals.
 
[[Category:Groups, Chats, and Threads]]
the participants have together counted from one to nine thousand, and seventy-two.<ref><cite class="note">as of November 20, 2023, at 9:48am CST, reported by Samuel Grady.</cite></ref> The thread that [[Hallie Griffon]] owned (made October 15th) has 49 respondents (over the course of almost 2620 messages).
(I do believe that they began counting backwards at some point around two thousand- I don't know if that is true or if it is when they turned around again and started going forwards, but as of right now it's at 7643 and increasing)

Navigation menu