Lets Count: Difference between revisions
(Wrote up page (with current data), added to Groups, Chats, and Threads Category.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thread series in 2023 HS Courtyard. | Thread series in 2023 HS Courtyard. | ||
Started by Shelli Selby, the series of threads "Lets Count" and "Lets Count: Continued" are filled with messages, mostly just people counting (the original thread started at one (presumably- I will not be verifying this) and counting one number per message, mostly no one person twice in a row, the participants have together counted from one to (currently as of September 11, 2023, at 6:44am CST) six thousand, one hundred, and two | Started by Shelli Selby, the series of threads "Lets Count" and "Lets Count: Continued" are filled with messages, mostly just people counting (the original thread started at one (presumably- I will not be verifying this) and counting one number per message, mostly no one person twice in a row, the participants have together counted from one to (currently as of September 11, 2023, at 6:44am CST) six thousand, one hundred, and two. The current thread has had 62 respondents (over the course of the almost 2,700 messages). | ||
(I do believe that they began counting backwards at some point around two thousand- I don't know if that is true or if it is when they turned around again and started going forwards, but as of right now it's at 6102 and increasing) | |||
[[Category:Groups, Chats, and Threads]] | [[Category:Groups, Chats, and Threads]] | ||
Revision as of 20:31, 11 September 2023
Thread series in 2023 HS Courtyard.
Started by Shelli Selby, the series of threads "Lets Count" and "Lets Count: Continued" are filled with messages, mostly just people counting (the original thread started at one (presumably- I will not be verifying this) and counting one number per message, mostly no one person twice in a row, the participants have together counted from one to (currently as of September 11, 2023, at 6:44am CST) six thousand, one hundred, and two. The current thread has had 62 respondents (over the course of the almost 2,700 messages).
(I do believe that they began counting backwards at some point around two thousand- I don't know if that is true or if it is when they turned around again and started going forwards, but as of right now it's at 6102 and increasing)