Lets Count: Difference between revisions

From NSA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (formatting)
mNo edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
<poem>
<poem>
1. Name: "lets count"
1. Name: "lets count"
  Date posted: 9/12/22
      Date posted: 9/12/22
  Number of messages sent:
      Number of messages sent:
  4183 Number of participants:
      4183 Number of participants:
  79 Number counted to: 3610
      79 Number counted to: 3610


2. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED"
2. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED"
  Date posted: 4/10/23
      Date posted: 4/10/23
  Number of messages sent: 3121
      Number of messages sent: 3121
  Number of participants: 72
      Number of participants: 72
  Number counted to: 6533
      Number counted to: 6533


3. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued"
3. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued"
  Date posted: 10/15/23
      Date posted: 10/15/23
  Number of messages sent: 2621
      Number of messages sent: 2621
  Number of participants: 50
      Number of participants: 50
  Number counted to: 9072
      Number counted to: 9072


4. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again"
4. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again"
  Date posted: 2/3/24
      Date posted: 2/3/24
  Number of messages sent: 66
      Number of messages sent: 66
  Number of participants: 8
      Number of participants: 8
  Number counted to: 9133
      Number counted to: 9133
 
</poem>''(current thread, update as needed.)''<ref>Last updated 2/3/24 at 5:48 CST by Owen Behrens</ref>
''(current thread, update as needed.)''<ref>Last updated 2/3/24 at 5:48 CST by Owen Behrens</ref>
</poem>


== Trivia ==
== Trivia ==

Revision as of 00:19, 4 February 2024

Thread series in the HS Courtyard.

Started by Shelli Selby, "Lets Count" was a thread in which people (mostly) counted up (the original thread started at one (presumably- I will not be verifying this))[1] and counting one number per message, with no person going twice in a row. (mostly)

History

The original thread simply had the title of "lets count" and was posted on September 12th, 2022. After quite a few messages, it started to get very laggy. If you went to notifications in teams, and the top one was a reply in the counting thread, it would crash teams, if not your whole computer. So, Shelli created a new thread called "Lets count: CONTINUED" on 4/10/23. However, that thread eventually experienced the same problem with lag. Since Shelli Selby had since left NSA, Hallie Griffin took up the mantle and created a thread called "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued" on 10/15/23. At the beginning of 2024, that thread also began to lag significantly. It lagged so much that the participants started talk of making a new thread. On February 3, 2024, Jacob Grady started a new thread called Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again.

List of Threads

1. Name: "lets count"
       Date posted: 9/12/22
       Number of messages sent:
       4183 Number of participants:
       79 Number counted to: 3610

2. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED"
       Date posted: 4/10/23
       Number of messages sent: 3121
       Number of participants: 72
       Number counted to: 6533

3. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued"
       Date posted: 10/15/23
       Number of messages sent: 2621
       Number of participants: 50
       Number counted to: 9072

4. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again"
       Date posted: 2/3/24
       Number of messages sent: 66
       Number of participants: 8
       Number counted to: 9133

(current thread, update as needed.)[2]

Trivia

In my research into the origin of the thread to fact-check this article, I stumbled across a thread posted by Shelli Selby called "lets count again." It was posted on 1/17/23, apparently because the original thread had died off. However, it only got 122 replies, and didn't seem to have much significance. The thread started over from one, and reached 63. Many of the numbers were sent as GIFs. After 63, Shelli said "i only made this one because i couldn't find the other one but now i did find it so the first one is my main focus XDD"


On 11/7/22, Daniel Simmons posted a thread titled "LETS COUNT BACKWARDS" It started at 2048, since that was the last number in the normal counting thread. It only reached 1035 before people lost interest. The last message was sent on 11/12/22. It had 24 messages from 7 respondents.


One interesting thing about these threads is the number of reactions they get. For example, the original "lets count" thread had 30 reactions, of 13 different types. "Lets count: CONTINUED" had 39 reactions, 23 of which were the infinity emoji. "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued" had 24 reactions with the infinity emoji. (this might be a record for most number of the same reaction? I'm not sure.)


At some point around two thousand, they began counting backwards - I'm not sure if that is true, or if it is, when they turned around again and started going forwards.[3]

Notes

  1. It did start at one, unless my memory absolutely fails me. I watched it for a while, and then got involved around 400. -Owen
  2. Last updated 2/3/24 at 5:48 CST by Owen Behrens
  3. Confirmed by Samuel Grady: After 2082, Keene Elkins jumped to 2100. Sunda Schwertfeger then proceeded to count backwards (probably to correct the jump). Then, after a few hundred backwards-counting messages, the counting continued forwards as normal (is there anything normal at northstar?), with some mild confusion to those who saw this afterward.