Lets Count: Difference between revisions

From NSA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Thread series in 2023 HS Courtyard.
Thread series in the HS Courtyard.


Started by [[Shelli Selby]], "Lets Count" was a thread in which people (mostly) counted up (the original thread started at one (presumably- I will not be verifying this))<ref><cite class="note">It did start at one, unless my memory absolutely fails me. I watched it for a while, and then got involved around 400. -[[Owen Behrens|Owen]]</ref> and counting one number per message, with no person going twice in a row. (mostly)  
Started by [[Shelli Selby]], "Lets Count" was a thread in which people (mostly) counted up (the original thread started at one (presumably- I will not be verifying this))<ref><cite class="note">It did start at one, unless my memory absolutely fails me. I watched it for a while, and then got involved around 400. -[[Owen Behrens|Owen]]</ref> and counting one number per message, with no person going twice in a row. (mostly)  


== History ==
The original thread simply had the title of "lets count" and was posted on September 12th, 2022. After quite a few messages, it started to get very laggy. If you went to notifications in teams, and the top one was a reply in the counting thread, it would crash teams, if not your whole computer. So, Shelli created a new thread called "Lets count: CONTINUED" on 4/10/23. However, that thread eventually experienced the same problem with lag. Since Shelli Selby had since left NSA, [[Hallie Griffin]] took up the mantle and created a thread called "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued" on 10/15/23. At the beginning of 2024, that thread also began to lag significantly. It lagged so much that the participants started talk of making a new thread. On February 3, 2024, [[Jacob Grady]] started a new thread called Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again.


After quite a few messages, (I don't remember how many, exactly, but it was a few thousand) the original thread started to get very laggy. If you went to notifications in teams, and the top one was a reply in the counting thread, it would crash teams, if not your whole computer. So, Shelli created a new thread called "Lets Count: CONTINUED" After another few thousand messages, however, that thread experienced the same problem with lag. Since Shelli Selby left NSA, [[Hallie Griffin]] took up the mantle and created a thread called "Lets Count: CONTINUED: Continued."
=== List of Threads ===


At the beginning of 2024, that thread also began to lag significantly. It lagged so much that the participants started talk of making a new thread. On February 3, 2024, when the old thread was at 9072, [[Jacob Grady]] started a new thread called Lets Count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again.
# Name: "lets count" Date posted: 9/12/22 Number of messages sent: 4183 Number of participants: 79 Number counted to: 3610
# Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED" Date posted: 4/10/23 Number of messages sent: 3121 Number of participants: 72 Number counted to: 6533
# Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued" Date posted: 10/15/23 Number of messages sent: 2621 Number of participants: 50 Number counted to: 9072
# Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again" Date posted: 2/3/24 Number of messages sent: 66 Number of participants: 8 Number counted to: 9133 ''(current thread, update as needed.)''<ref>Last updated 2/3/24 at 5:48 CST by Owen Behrens</ref>


The participants have together counted from one to nine thousand, one hundred, and twenty-seven.<ref>as of February 3, 2024, at 1:12 PM CST, reported by Owen Behrens.</ref> The thread that [[Hallie Griffin]] created (made October 15th) has 50 respondents (over the course of 2621 messages). The thread that Jacob Grady made currently has 58 replies from six individuals.
== Trivia ==
In my research into the origin of the thread to fact-check this article, I stumbled across a thread posted by Shelli Selby called "lets count again." It was posted on 1/17/23, apparently because the original thread had died off. However, it only got 122 replies, and didn't seem to have much significance. The thread started over from one, and reached 63. Many of the numbers were sent as GIFs. After 63, Shelli said "i only made this one because i couldn't find the other one but now i did find it so the first one is my main focus XDD"




(I do believe that they began counting backwards at some point around two thousand- I don't know if that is true or if it is when they turned around again and started going forwards, but as of right now it's at 7643 and increasing)<ref><cite class="note">Confirmed by [[Samuel Grady]]: After 2082, [[Keene Elkins]] jumped to 2100. [[Sunda Schwertfeger]] then proceeded to count backwards (probably to correct the jump). Then, after a few hundred backwards-counting messages, the counting continued forwards as normal (is there anything normal at northstar?), with some mild confusion to those who saw this afterward.</cite></ref>
On 11/7/22, [[Daniel Simmons]] posted a thread titled "LETS COUNT BACKWARDS" It started at 2048, since that was the last number in the normal counting thread. It only reached 1035 before people lost interest. The last message was sent on 11/12/22. It had 24 messages from 7 respondents.
 
 
One interesting thing about these threads is the number of reactions they get. For example, the original "lets count" thread had 30 reactions, of 13 different types. "Lets count: CONTINUED" had 39 reactions, 23 of which were the infinity emoji. "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued" had 24 reactions with the infinity emoji. (this might be a record for most number of the same reaction? I'm not sure.)
 
 
At some point around two thousand, they began counting backwards - I'm not sure if that is true, or if it is, when they turned around again and started going forwards.<ref><cite class="note">Confirmed by [[Samuel Grady]]: After 2082, [[Keene Elkins]] jumped to 2100. [[Sunda Schwertfeger]] then proceeded to count backwards (probably to correct the jump). Then, after a few hundred backwards-counting messages, the counting continued forwards as normal (is there anything normal at northstar?), with some mild confusion to those who saw this afterward.</cite></ref>


==Notes==
==Notes==

Revision as of 00:09, 4 February 2024

Thread series in the HS Courtyard.

Started by Shelli Selby, "Lets Count" was a thread in which people (mostly) counted up (the original thread started at one (presumably- I will not be verifying this))[1] and counting one number per message, with no person going twice in a row. (mostly)

History

The original thread simply had the title of "lets count" and was posted on September 12th, 2022. After quite a few messages, it started to get very laggy. If you went to notifications in teams, and the top one was a reply in the counting thread, it would crash teams, if not your whole computer. So, Shelli created a new thread called "Lets count: CONTINUED" on 4/10/23. However, that thread eventually experienced the same problem with lag. Since Shelli Selby had since left NSA, Hallie Griffin took up the mantle and created a thread called "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued" on 10/15/23. At the beginning of 2024, that thread also began to lag significantly. It lagged so much that the participants started talk of making a new thread. On February 3, 2024, Jacob Grady started a new thread called Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again.

List of Threads

  1. Name: "lets count" Date posted: 9/12/22 Number of messages sent: 4183 Number of participants: 79 Number counted to: 3610
  2. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED" Date posted: 4/10/23 Number of messages sent: 3121 Number of participants: 72 Number counted to: 6533
  3. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued" Date posted: 10/15/23 Number of messages sent: 2621 Number of participants: 50 Number counted to: 9072
  4. Name: "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued: Again" Date posted: 2/3/24 Number of messages sent: 66 Number of participants: 8 Number counted to: 9133 (current thread, update as needed.)[2]

Trivia

In my research into the origin of the thread to fact-check this article, I stumbled across a thread posted by Shelli Selby called "lets count again." It was posted on 1/17/23, apparently because the original thread had died off. However, it only got 122 replies, and didn't seem to have much significance. The thread started over from one, and reached 63. Many of the numbers were sent as GIFs. After 63, Shelli said "i only made this one because i couldn't find the other one but now i did find it so the first one is my main focus XDD"


On 11/7/22, Daniel Simmons posted a thread titled "LETS COUNT BACKWARDS" It started at 2048, since that was the last number in the normal counting thread. It only reached 1035 before people lost interest. The last message was sent on 11/12/22. It had 24 messages from 7 respondents.


One interesting thing about these threads is the number of reactions they get. For example, the original "lets count" thread had 30 reactions, of 13 different types. "Lets count: CONTINUED" had 39 reactions, 23 of which were the infinity emoji. "Lets count: CONTINUED: Continued" had 24 reactions with the infinity emoji. (this might be a record for most number of the same reaction? I'm not sure.)


At some point around two thousand, they began counting backwards - I'm not sure if that is true, or if it is, when they turned around again and started going forwards.[3]

Notes

  1. It did start at one, unless my memory absolutely fails me. I watched it for a while, and then got involved around 400. -Owen
  2. Last updated 2/3/24 at 5:48 CST by Owen Behrens
  3. Confirmed by Samuel Grady: After 2082, Keene Elkins jumped to 2100. Sunda Schwertfeger then proceeded to count backwards (probably to correct the jump). Then, after a few hundred backwards-counting messages, the counting continued forwards as normal (is there anything normal at northstar?), with some mild confusion to those who saw this afterward.